SHARE WITH FRIENDS:
The Antimonopoly Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan conducted an inspection of JSC "UzAuto Motors" in accordance with the requirements of the legislation and filed a lawsuit against the company on the grounds of violation of the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Competition" was reported to have been injured.
According to the press service of the Antimonopoly Committee, today, August 2020, 19, the case was considered at a regular meeting of the special commission of the Committee. detected.
In particular, by JSC "UzAuto Motors":
-
In the formation of the basic wholesale and retail prices for manufactured cars, a monopoly high price was applied through unreasonable increase in costs, resulting in an average increase in car prices by 10,29%;
-
In the formation of the basic wholesale and retail prices for manufactured cars, a monopoly high price was applied through unreasonable increase in costs, resulting in an average increase in car prices by 10,29%;
-
The commission of actions that discriminate against the rights and interests of consumers and business entities in the sale of cars to dealers through dealers, including conditions that are not related to the subject of the contract, may or may not lead to restriction of competition. It was revealed that he had committed other acts and abused his dominant position by blocking the entry of other business entities into the car sales market.
The special commission studied the above cases in detail and instructed UzAuto Motors JSC to eliminate the violations.
According to him, UzAuto Motors JSC:
Firstly, the application of a monopoly high price in the formation of the price of passenger cars produced by society by including the cost of raw materials, fuel and energy resources and unrealized costs, unrealized labor costs and other costs or unfinished work in the formation of the price of goods, including approved in March 2020, in force today and sold to consumers:
- Spark car LS M / T modification from the retail price of 3 002 010 soums and LT A / T modification from the retail price of 3 563 704 soums;
- Nexia 3 LT M / T modification at the retail price of 3 soums and LTZ A / T modification at the retail price of 112 soums;
- Cobalt LT M / T modification at the retail price of 4 soums and LTZ A / T modification at the retail price of 404 soums;
- Gentra car SX M / T modification from the retail price of 13 825 248 soums, SX M / T CNG modification from the retail price of 13 718 618 soums and CDX A / T Plus modification from the retail price of 19 806 932 soums;
- Unjustified deduction of 15 soums from the retail price of Damas car DLX modification, 458 soums from the retail price of VAN modification and 984 soums from the retail price of Labo modification and distribution of these funds to consumers should return.
Secondly, future contracts for the sale of cars (from the date of this decision) on the basis of prices formed by deducting the above unreasonable costs, or based on the marketing strategy of the company, the price of cars on average at least 10,29% and Ensuring the implementation of taking into account the reduction of unreasonable costs from the cost of 942 891 108 031 soums.
Submission to the Committee of the revised new approved prices for passenger cars by the Society, taking into account the above.
Third, to ensure that cars produced by the company are sold to consumers only in strict accordance with the sequence of contracts concluded through the program "UzAvtoSavdo".
Fourth, to ensure that export-oriented cars are evenly distributed in the domestic market through dealers in the event that they are not exported or return from export.
Fifth, ensure that the same conditions are applied to existing dealers and all business entities wishing to operate as dealers, as well as to refrain from actions that may or may not lead to restriction of competition.
Sixth, To exclude from the dealership agreement with Azimavtomotive LLC the condition of prepayment in the amount of 10 billion soums.
Seventh, when bidders were offered to enter into a distribution agreement for the sale of cars included in a special promotion on the basis of a fixed payment, all participants were obliged to conclude a contract on equal terms.
It was explained that the decision could be appealed to the Board of the Antimonopoly Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan or the relevant administrative court within a month.