It takes a long time to say a word and make a sentence out of it. It is a great crime for a writer to understand a sentence and not for others to understand it. Original writing is about being able to convey the point you want to make to everyone equally, without creating misunderstandings.
The pen is the bullet, the literature is not the ketmon market. Sentences from every word that comes to mind improperly are not considered a virtue of weaving. Let the word remain, let the thought be the brick laid in it, and let it lay the foundation for a new awning of life as many are ripe from the pitcher.
* * *
The writer must study life in all its aspects, in order to be aware of all its aspects. In part, what I experienced played a big role in my becoming a writer. Even our young people who want to become real writers need to get into this life first, to know it.
* * *
Everyone who becomes a writer should be familiar with the currents and schools of literature. It is necessary to re-read the works of the best writers several times. Even when reading, the writer should keep an eye on what he or she is trying to say and how he or she can convey his or her thoughts to the reader. Only then can a profession be learned from writers.
* * *
The writer should never place words and sentences that do not serve the purpose of expressing an opinion. Only then will you have an independent style and expression that will not allow you to correct the phrase, and will ensure your future in your pen. It is not good to trust someone and try in vain. Do not turn your back on someone and bless the spirit of your talent. Writing in ten hours, not one hour, is not only useful, but also more promising than writing with the help of a person.
* * *
One of the things that makes a story “wet” is telling it instead of showing it. If Ochumelov's bullshit was not expressed by his words, but described by the author, the world would be a mess. Chekhov does not say this himself, but points to Ochumelov in his own words in short lines.
* * *
Style is a feature that depends on knowing the language and is known as the character of each writer’s language. Once writing skills are acquired, style also comes naturally.
* * *
When we say comedy, we should not laugh at what is right, but laugh at its original condition, and when we write it, we should take the subject from a rotten part of our lives and, at the same time, write it on the scales of literature.
* * *
When you write a joke, don’t pretend it’s made by you, but make it yourself. Let him complain about himself. So that not only your student, but even your laughing opponent will be forced to laugh with you without conflict.
Although there are several different ways of laughing in the literature (e.g., pitching, cutting, sarcasm, tagging, etc.) but the most respectable is character laughter.
* * *
There are two types of criticism in the literary world: serious and humorous criticism. Although serious criticism makes changes to the target it observes, it is often more vague to the public. It can be said that serious criticism seems to be specific to the people in question, that is, to the upper classes of the intelligentsia. After that, serious criticism cannot be degraded even to walk into every corner of life. Although viewed in this respect, it is far from a public feature.
Comic criticism (in the sense of satire), which is the second type of criticism, can be called public. Because laughter is a flying eagle that criticizes life. Elements that are not suitable for living conditions, such as weakness, redness, abomination, lice, and so on, feed him.
Humorous criticism is close to the spirit of the common man and is an interpreter of the issues he felt but could not express. Conclusion: The element of humor in the nature of comic criticism is the lover of the common man, again, his own creation.
* * *
One of the good features of the historical novel is that on the one hand it is interesting as a work of art, on the other hand it acquaints the reader with some history…
* * *
The Uzbek language is not poor, but those who say that the Uzbek language is poor are poor. Let them not turn their ignorance into Uzbek.
* * *
All languages "borrow" from neighboring languages. It is impossible without it. If the work is written only in its own language, it will be dry. The writer must master the language and folklore of his people, and it is a virtue to know several languages, especially the languages of the neighboring army. Only then will the language be enriched and the work come to life.
* * *
It is necessary to understand and read the book. Sometimes understanding is not enough. Thoughts can be quickly forgotten. In such cases, it is necessary to memorize some necessary points.
It is possible to imagine a writer, even if he is not known personally, by reading his works and knowing in person what kind of person he is. Because he mainly describes his nature and spirit in his works.
