Moral culture and professional etiquette

SHARE WITH FRIENDS:

Moral culture and professional etiquette
  1. Moral culture and professional etiquette.
  2. Ways and means of moral education.
  3. Interactions of ethics with other social and spiritual phenomena: ethics and religion, ethics and law, ethics and politics, ethics and art, ethics and science, ethics and ideology.
  1. The level of moral excellence in the state and civil society is determined by the moral culture of their citizens. Ethical culture includes aspects such as a person's acquisition of the moral experiences of society and the use of these experiences in his relations with other people, as well as his regular self-improvement. In short, it is a sign of a person's moral development. Because moral culture is a structure that includes a number of elements of the culture of moral thinking. It is manifested in a person's interactions with others.
One of the most important elements of moral culture is etiquette. It is essentially one of the forms of mutual cooperation. The human race cannot officially live without cooperation with each other, exchange of experience, and influence on each other. A need, a necessity for a good person, a healthy person suffers mentally without it, his mood drops. At this point, it is enough to recall the famous work "The Adventures of Robinson Crusoe" written by the great English writer Daniel Defoe: this is the reason why Robinson was so happy when he found Jumaboy.
Etiquette of dealings requires putting other people's value and dignity in place, fulfilling traditional moral and normative requirements. At the same time, it is distinguished by the fact that it shows the good aspects of a person. Its brightest, most meaningful and most expressive manifestation occurs through speech. The ability to speak and listen, the culture of conversation are important aspects of communication. Therefore, the manners of behavior manifest themselves, first of all, in moral standards such as politeness, modesty, modesty, and cheerfulness.
Another "mirror" of etiquette is a human look. It is known that in a person's gaze, facial expression, and hand movements, his unspoken, unspoken feelings and demands are reflected. For example, waving your hand without listening to the interlocutor until the end means uncivilized behavior. Sometimes a look speaks louder than words. For example, a master builder may shake his head and smile to express his displeasure with the actions of his apprentice. The second master expresses his attitude with a momentary glance. The first master with facial expression and handwriting - with movement; From the point of view of the second master, if it means "Obbo Shovoz - hey, you're in a hurry - yes, it's okay, there's no harm in it." You can hear the words: "You've messed up your job again - damn it, when will you become a man?". Undoubtedly, the first master observed manners in his dealings, while the second one shows his opposite - not his student's, but his own indecency.
In general, etiquette is the influence of people on each other without advice and manners, as a means of education and self-education. Therefore, the formation of behavior in our youth is one of the important tasks facing our society today. In this, the influence of father - mother, neighborhood - village is great. You need to be able to use it. Because the achievement of moral perfection begins with the mastery of manners.
Ethical culture is one of the most visible forms of relationships, and this is etiquette. It mostly governs the external culture of a person, the fulfillment of the rules of self-behavior in mutual relations. If a person has a creative approach to his relations, that is, he has the opportunity to deal with several things in one situation, then etiquette requires only one set of rules for a specific situation - action.
The scope of etiquette is wide, it includes, in a certain sense, the rules of behavior accepted at the international level. For example, the etiquette of a political figure, the etiquette of hospitality, etc. We see a classic example of observing etiquette through the television screen. Remember the ceremony of handing over credentials of ambassadors of foreign countries to President Islam Karimov. There is only one homogeneity, the rule established at the international level. Neither the President nor the ambassadors have the right to break it. Or a very simple, small example: holding a knife in the right hand at the table is one of the strict rules of modern hospitality etiquette - breaking it will cause surprise and ridicule. That's why etiquette can be said to be a customary, fixed manners of behavior.
Etiquette is a positive, eye-pleasing act of etiquette, developed to the smallest detail. But, at the same time, it is also manifested in the form of mandatory etiquette, which has lost its original moral basis: the person who follows the rules of etiquette may actually be doing something against his will. In this respect, it becomes a form of hypocrisy. For example, let's say you rush out of the gate to work in the morning. Your acquaintance or neighbor will meet you. You see him, ask how he is, and invite him inside, saying: "Let's go to the house, make tea, and have a good time." But in fact, you don't want him to enter the house at all, you don't have time, you even think about the time you wasted on this meeting. So, against your will, you tell lies about etiquette and politeness, and even if it sounds ugly, you are being hypocritical. Nevertheless, in general, etiquette is important because it teaches a person to a certain order - rule, no matter what internal mental conditions, modesty, gentleness and patience.
         Ethical culture is also evident in professional etiquette. Because when a person reaches adulthood and becomes the head of a profession, he regularly interacts with people within his profession. This relationship occurs, on the one hand, in the circle of colleagues, and on the other hand, it occurs with different categories of people who meet according to the requirements of the profession. At the same time, professional etiquette is one of the highest forms of moral culture, its place in the moral life of society is high. Therefore, it is permissible to dwell more on professional etiquette.
In every society there are certain groups whose occupations lead them to a privileged position compared to other members of society. Factors such as the life and death, health, moral health, legal protection, and manifestation of scientific potential of the majority of society members determine the extent to which the holders of such privileged professions feel the responsibility of their professional duty. it is known to everyone that it depends on their ability to act honestly and conscientiously. For example, let's take a medical worker, a surgeon. Let's say he brings a few people back to life each day of surgery; hundreds of people need his help, look to him with hope and confidence. Well, what if the surgeon betrays his patient for personal gain, that is, kills him on purpose? Who can guarantee that he will not do so? Or take a journalist. Isn't it possible for him to use the weakness of his profession for his personal benefit, to put innocent people to moral pain, to deliberately embarrass him in front of the society, and thus solve some of his own problems? It is possible. After all, until the truth comes to light, there is no question that a person who has been unjustly criticized will be finished. Well, who guarantees that a journalist will not do so? Therefore, in order to avoid vices such as arbitrariness, self-interest, arrogance and abuse of profession in the activities of those who can do things that others cannot do, as well as in order to ensure that their moral level is at a high level, in many cases a set of mutual rules is created. This set of rules usually took the form of oaths or norms. Violation of it is considered extremely indecent and immoral, even treason. Such oaths have a very long history. As an example, the famous "Hippocratic Oath" compiled by the Ancient Greek judge Hippocrates (V-IV centuries BC), which has not lost its importance even today, is compiled in a short and succinct form, which includes the professional ethics of medical personnel and the rules of law.
There are many healers in history who heal their enemies. For example, in the ancient Indian epic "Ramayana" (II - century), the unique experiences of the king of the giants, who was at the head of the unconscious Lakshmana, are important in this respect. The doctor had two options: one is to treat the enemy of the kingdom as a needy patient, and the other is to condemn him to death by refusing treatment. After much deliberation, the doctor chooses to obey the rules of medical etiquette and treat Lakshman. Because according to the requirements of the law and the rules of professional etiquette, the notions of friend or enemy for the doctor at the patient's bed lose their meaning, only a weak person is waiting for medical help, in need of mercy. After recovering, Lakshman kills Indirjid, the incomparably great warrior and crown prince of the land of the giants, in battle and leads to the decline of the country of Lanka, where the healer is a citizen. However, the reader does not call the doctor a traitor or a traitor, on the contrary, he admires his moral courage, honesty, and loyalty to his professional duty. Or take the fate of the famous Russian scientist Academician Andrei Sakharov. A great theoretician, a physicist, an unparalleled specialist in the field of thermonuclear, the main discoverer of the hydrogen bomb, the owner of dozens of orders and medals for his services in strengthening the defense of the Motherland, a two-time Hero of Socialist Labor, what did this prestigious and wealthy man lack? Why was he determined to get away with it all - publicly opposing weapons of mass destruction, including the hydrogen bomb tests he created. As a result, the repressive regime of the Soviets isolated him from the scientific community, exiled him to one of the Russian cities far from the capital, and forbade his name to be mentioned in the press or in books. However, he could live more honorably than anyone else. Sakharov chose the path of high morals - he placed the fulfillment of scholarly duty and moral requirements higher than any wealth, honor - honor. The great scientist fought against its practical application because his discovery could and partially jeopardizes the highest human right - the right to life. He steadfastly endured the fact that the ideology of the Soviets declared him to be a treacherous citizen who tried to weaken the power of the defense of the Motherland, heaped countless slanders, reproaches and slanders on his head, he did not back down from his promise, he was in the hands of the kingdom of evil. he did not allow his scientific talent to become a puppet and become a military bolt. After all, he was praised by all mankind as one of the world's greatest defenders of human rights. Many such examples can be cited.
In addition to these, there are several types of professional etiquette, such as the etiquette of teachers, the etiquette of law enforcement officers, and the etiquette of engineers, which are also important in the chain of moral relations in society. It should also be said that the sphere of influence and scope of all rules of professional etiquette are not the same. Some violations of professional etiquette go beyond simple indecency and turn into immorality. For example, let's touch on some points in leadership ethics. If the leader is disrespectful and rude to the subordinates, or if the ordinary people in the area or organization entrusted to him are indifferent to their needs, wishes, and desires, it is immoral for him to gain personal wealth through corruption in the country, region. or sacrificing the interests of the organization can be considered immoral, not only the profession of leadership, but also betrayal of the Motherland. That is why professional etiquette is sometimes called professional ethics.
As can be seen from the above, the problem of professional etiquette is not, as some people think, one of the minor issues of ethics. Comprehensive study of it, research of the relationship between professional freedom and professional duty will occupy an important place in the ethics of the XNUMXst century. Because professional ethics should be evaluated as a moral phenomenon that manifests itself in the moral life of individuals and society in the form of practical ethics.
  1. A person's moral life is closely related to his moral education. After all, moral education is one of the continuous processes that ensure the development of a person as a person. In it, an individual realizes moral values, stabilizes moral qualities in himself, learns to live on the basis of moral principles and standards. Moral education seeks answers to two important questions throughout the history of mankind: one is how to live, and the other is what to do. The process of searching for answers to these questions is a practical form of moral education.
There is a saying that education begins in the mother's womb. Its original meaning is that, first of all, the father and mother should have received moral education. After all, a bird does what it sees in its nest: the father and mother should set a high moral example in the family.
It should also be noted that the materialistic view that morals arise in a person only through moral education has been dominant for many years. True, the importance of moral education is extremely great. But morality is a divine gift given to man as the most important of his human characteristics. We improve this spiritual blessing - the basis with the help of moral education. Otherwise, we would be able to raise moral beings even from monkeys and dogs.
Thus, moral education is one of the ways to bring a human child to perfection. It has many tools. Some of them are traditional means of education, and another part are modern means. Usually, both types of tools are used. For example, in pre-school moral education, traditional education through fairy tales and narratives and modern education through toys and games are successfully used; in this, the child is encouraged not to be angry, arrogant, to be honest with the help of games. Television, radio, puppet theater, cinema plays a big role in children's moral education.
In general, the most powerful tool of moral education is art. This tool covers all sections of the population, people of different ages. Especially the fiction genre of art is extensive. Works published in genres ranging from fairy tales to novels play a huge role in the moral formation of a person. Through them, the reader, as a student, has an artistic perception of what is good and evil; they are also important in choosing an ideal. In addition, there are collections of stories, narratives and advices of fiction directly intended for moral education, which, as we saw above, we call pandnoms: "Kalila and Dimna", "Nightmare", "Gulistan", "Zarbulmasal" Classical works have served as a means of traditional moral education for many centuries and generations, and will continue to do so.
The way of moral education that is relevant for all times is the principle of exemplification. In the family, first of all, as mentioned above, the father should be a moral example for the child. It should not be overlooked that teachers are accepted by their students as a personal role model, from the teaching methods to the "small" actions of teachers in schools and universities. Etiquette, honesty, and truthfulness in teacher-student relationships are among the factors that ensure the formation of moral education of young people.
Currently, television can be cited as the most powerful modern means of moral education. It has the ability to screen and display works created in almost all types of art. In addition, there are also regular shows dedicated to moral education. Uzbek-language programs such as "Otalar sozi - aql'n kozi", "Rivayat", "Aqshom Ertaklari" can be examples of this. That's why television should never become an enterprise of easy-going songs, pornographic commercials, and "kill-kill" video films that harden the human heart.
It is desirable to combine moral education with mental, spiritual and physical education. At that time, our society will become a fully developed civil society. In our country, all legal and social conditions have been created for this.
  1. Ethics occupies the most important place in the system of spirituality and works in close connection with other areas in it. Now let's briefly touch on the most important of these connections.
First of all, let's take the issue of morality and religion. In this regard, in addition to the above points, it can be said that, in essence, religion requires the morality of human life. Therefore, religious and Shariah principles and standards, teachings in the hadith are closely related to the rules of ethics and manners. For example, a person is strictly protected as the highest value. It is not possible to kill a person, killing a person is the greatest immorality. Theft, embezzlement, hypocrisy, cheating, lying, and other similar vices are prohibited from the religious, Shariah, and moral point of view. On the contrary, honoring a person, people helping each other, correctness, truthfulness, honesty, compassion, refraining from flattery, no matter how high a fellow human being is, worshiping only the creation. Virtues like these are actions approved by both religious piety and moral demands. Therefore, Marxian-Leninist views, which interpret morality as an autonomous spiritual phenomenon independent of religion, have no logical and scientific basis. Religion, as we mentioned, works as a means of moralizing a person. So, religious piety and moral demand have the same root. in both cases, conscience appears as an invisible governing bolt. It is an inward view; and the outward appearance is reflected in Sharia rulings and legal laws.
By saying that the moral requirement is reflected in the legal law - rules, we confirm that morality and law have a strong connection. Because in fact it is. The legal law - rules in a certain society are created on the basis of moral beliefs, principles, norms, as well as relatively general customs - customs developed by the people of that region over the centuries. But some customs and traditions may not rise to the level of legal norms. This is because, first of all, they have a relatively private nature, and moreover, they cannot meet the requirements of moral and legal development. For example, during the period of Jahiliyyah, when a girl was born, the Arabs had a custom of burying her alive. Later, when Islam spread, this custom was rejected as a non-Muslim custom. As of now, such an event is considered a crime under legal laws. Or the custom of taking hun, which existed in our region in ancient times, is now considered a crime. Many such examples can be cited.
It can be seen that, although ethics and law have the same roots, their methods of managing the moral life of society are different: ethics is mainly explanatory, and works through instruction, while law is a mandatory method, punitive measures. works through At the same time, it should also be said that law has much clearer and more specific internal divisions than morality. For example, international law, civil law, criminal law, labor law, etc. have relatively strictly limited legal norms. Morality is much broader than law. For example, if legal laws are applied to the existing system and to people of a certain age group, then moral rules, wisdom, and teachings apply to all systems and people of different ages. Also, legal norms require a specific address, while moral rules are distinguished by their abstractness and generality.
The relationship between ethics and politics is also extremely ancient: it has existed since the first state. For example, although the set of laws developed by the Babylonian king Hammurabi in the XNUMXth century BC is a legal document, it is based on the moral virtue of maintaining justice. Because Hammurapi states that he introduced these laws in order to establish truth in the country, to establish justice, to show care and mercy to orphans and widows.
In the history of ethics, it can be seen that there are two views on the relationship between ethics and politics. According to one of them, politics should be moral, and according to the second, politics is incompatible with morality.
The first view essentially puts morality above politics: politics must be subordinated to morality. In other words, unity of ends and means must be achieved, that is, great, pure ideals must be realized only through morally pure means. But in this, ethics should not fulfill the role of politics. Otherwise, it is possible to excessively limit the work of certain state institutions, especially organizations such as law and order and military agencies, and make them very weak.
The second view essentially requires that politics does not count with morality. Proponents of this point of view emphasize the subjugation of morality to politics and the need to completely turn away from it when necessary. For them, morality is a pitfall in the way of achieving great ideals, surrounds the society with universal values, leads to depression, laziness, and finally, to the head. Therefore, any means can be used to achieve great goals faster. After all, the finally achieved goal washes away the atrocities, atrocities, deceptions and frauds. However, only a temporary victory can be achieved through this method. In the end, this victory not only disappears, but turns into a defeat. As an example, you can refer to the system of councils. Attempting to make the people happy by force, deception and repression, the victory achieved at the expense of millions of people for the sake of "the happiness of the people", ended up as a great defeat. As we have mentioned above, it proves in practice that the pursuit of noble goals by dirty means is not pure. Now it is known to everyone that the nations that were part of the former Union of Soviets have been separated from the world due to immoral politics, and lies, bribery, and hypocrisy have become a habit for these regions. It is an obvious reality that it will take decades to get rid of these evils. So, turning a blind eye to morality in politics, some of the defects that arise in its moralization are hundreds, thousands, and tragic. fundamental moralization of its policy is the primary task of every modern state today.
When talking about the relationship between morality and art, first of all, it should be noted that it is closely related to flesh and nails. Because in every true work of art, the struggle between good and evil is perceived as the main conflict, virtues such as humanity, truthfulness, correctness, justice, love, loyalty are glorified, fate, death and dying Issues such as immortality, the meaning of life, and the pursuit of happiness are raised. The problem of moral ideal is the crown of every artistic work. For example, Alisher Navoi's Farhodi, Shirin, Shakespeare's Romeo, Juliet, Aybek's Navoi are moral ideals in the works of these authors. It is impossible to imagine the works of Navoi, Shakespeare and Oibek without them.
There is also the fact that in some works of art, one does not encounter a moral ideal, one does not even meet a positive hero, the work is dedicated to the reflection of life from the head to the feet to the negative artistic images. The author creates such artistic images from the point of view of the moral level achieved by his time. Examples include Byron's epic "Beppo", Gogol's "Dead Souls", Zavqi's "Hajvi ahli rasta", Abdulla Qadiri's "From the memory of Kalvak Mahzum". In these works, moral problems and the issue of high morality are not directly, as in the previous examples, but indirectly - through a satirical method.
In addition, the art of speech has its own "moral genres", so to speak. They can be found both in folklore and in written literature: proverbs, sayings, stories, narratives, parables, proverbs, etc. are among them. In general, there cannot be an immoral work of art, for all works of art morality has a common ground value.
In addition, art appears as a propagator of ethics, the most convenient means of moral education. For example, the importance of fiction, cinematography, fine art and theater art, especially in this regard, is incomparable. These types of art play a great role in the formation of moral ideals in young people. For example, children's imitation of the brave, brave, tenacious, patriotic and honest American Indian captain, Alpomish, Gorogli and other national heroes in the "war - war" games is proof of our opinion.
The issue of interaction between ethics and science is also important. According to some views, morality has nothing to do with science. Such views cannot be called correct. The very status of ethics as a research object of ethics shows its relevance to science.
In particular, the relationship between ethics and social sciences is extensive. For example, many scientific views and theories directly or indirectly call a person to be a high moral, wise and honest person.
But there are some theories that can be called immoral. There are many examples of this. For example, the famous "Malthus theory". According to the idea put forward by the British economic theorist Malthus (1766-1834), the population develops according to geometric progression, and consumer products according to arithmetic progression. As the population grows, poverty and food shortages appear on earth. Therefore, it is natural to wage wars. Malthus here shows the highest form of immorality by promoting war. Also, Marxian-Leninist theories of classism and socialist revolution, which promote the division of human society into opposing classes, the acquisition of power through violence, bloodshed, and terror, and maintaining it in this way, are also examples of immorality in science. A bulge is a prominent example.
It is known that all sciences, especially natural sciences, serve to reveal the truth in their field. The final result of morality is to lead a person to the truth, to educate him as a perfect being. It is at this point that ethics and science come into indirect relation. At the moment, the world-wide achievements in science present new moral tasks and problems to the human society. For example, recently, due to the high level of science and technology development and the emergence of environmental crises, new trends in the world of ethics, such as ecological ethics, have emerged; the need to move from the noosphere, or in other words, from the technosphere to the etosphere - the moral environment, is set as the most urgent task before the moral culture of human society; because today it can be clearly felt that this task is not only a problem within the framework of ethics, but is comprehensive, and that it has become a problem of the future existence or non-existence of the whole Earth.
Therefore, the next stages of the development of technical sciences should be carried out only in accordance with moral requirements, so to speak, under moral control.
True, some may object to us that science is an absolutely objective phenomenon, it is essentially neutral, and therefore it is unacceptable to subordinate it to morality. However, if we remember that science is created by people who are prone to different feelings, passions, and have different moral qualities and even vices, we can be sure that such objections are inadmissible. Because the spiritual and moral condition of every scientist cannot be reflected in his discoveries to some extent. Therefore, science is directly and indirectly related to morality, and this connection serves the function of humanizing natural and technical sciences.
The connection between morality and ideology is also very important in the life of society. It is known that each ideology consists of a system of specific ideas and views. It is difficult to imagine official ideology without moral ideas. But an idea never exists by itself. It certainly finds perception in a person and becomes specific. Hegel says about this in his "Encyclopedia of Philosophical Knowledge": "When talking about an idea, it is not necessary to imagine it as something distant and beyond. ¢oya, on the contrary, participates here as a whole and, therefore, exists in every consciousness, to say the least, in a corrupted and weakened state. Therefore, only people who embody certain ideas, including moral ideas, create ideology and popularize it.
It is natural for every democratic state and society to have several ideologies. But one of them occupies a leadership position. This leadership does not deny other ideologies and is characterized by the fact that it reflects the will of the majority of the members of the society. That is why it is called national ideology. In our country, which has set a free democratic civil society as its task, serious attention is paid to this issue. For example, in the first section of the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Article 12 of the first chapter, it is written as follows: "Social life in the Republic of Uzbekistan develops on the basis of the diversity of political institutions, ideologies and thoughts." No ideology can be established as a state ideology."
Therefore, our state, based on the principles of democracy, works as an institute that ensures the right to live of all ideologies. Our national ideology serves the development of the country and the nation as an embodiment of the social, philosophical, moral, and aesthetic ideas of the majority of society members, without belittling any other ideology. For example, it is primarily based on high morality. Our national ideology prioritizes the principles of patriotism, nationalism, and intellectualism in our society and calls every citizen to participate in the creation of a great state. At the same time, he calls for universal spiritual values, respect for other nations and peoples, and promotes the idea of ​​equality among equals. This ideology corresponds to the moral standards of our nation, its ideals of goodness and well-being, the principles of tyranny and peace-loving, therefore it is needed.
We are also aware of ideologies that tried to avoid morality from history or mask it as immorality and live by falsifying morality. They are usually declared to be the only ideology of a particular country and it is tried to inculcate it in the nation through lies. Among these are the ideology of national socialism promoted by the Hitlerites in Germany or the communist ideology of the former Soviet Union. both ideologies demanded physical destruction of self-confessed "ideological enemies"—promoted the greatest immorality as morality. But disguised dirt does not last long. The great Russian poet Alexander Pushkin beautifully described this situation in his poem "Revival":
The wild artist is sleepy, sleepless,
It spoils the image of a genius
And he himself on the picture
Beburd draws a picture.
But those foreign paints are the same
As the year goes by, it's obvious;
And the work of genius is perfect
It will appear as before...
(Translated by Turob Tola)
In this poem, you can see the fate of the ideologies of totalitarian regimes - the pictures drawn by "savage artists" such as Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler. Because morality is the guarantee of the success of any ideology. Morality and ideology are inextricably linked.
 

Leave a comment